Out of the 8 colour ads in The Hindu (Delhi edition)- 6 were by the government (21/9/2008). And all the governments ads were larger than the 2 private ads (not considering small classified ads).
Why is the government advertising so much? Are private institutions not as interested or is the govt providing a higher rate? So many questions - maybe the media guys will know better.
I wont speculate; leaving you with a glimpse of all the govt. ads
i came back to Mumbai from Delhi after my wonderful trip to Pilani where i conducted a few discussions on advertising, web 2.0 and social media. I came via the Mumbai Rajdhani (liesurely, to say the least). On board the train that does Laloo Yadav proud, we were served our customary introductory snack. I wont do into the details of what, why, and how. 1 thing on the plate caught my attention - 2 little eclair toffees.
I often remember my dad getting me such loose sweets after he returned home from a long trip. He always told me it was from the flight. I always relished them. Im sure on my train as well there probably were many dads doing the same as my dad used to make their little boys and girls happy. But this is not only about them. I shamelessly shunned aside the sweets despite thinking about what i've just penned down. It must take a lot to be a father. You need to really stop making yourself be the center of your universe i guess. You need to care about others as much as you care about yourself. Its difficult. Thankfully i have a while to go. And miles to cover before i get there.
I often remember my dad getting me such loose sweets after he returned home from a long trip. He always told me it was from the flight. I always relished them. Im sure on my train as well there probably were many dads doing the same as my dad used to make their little boys and girls happy. But this is not only about them. I shamelessly shunned aside the sweets despite thinking about what i've just penned down. It must take a lot to be a father. You need to really stop making yourself be the center of your universe i guess. You need to care about others as much as you care about yourself. Its difficult. Thankfully i have a while to go. And miles to cover before i get there.
A few weeks back, i stumbled upon an interesting post by Saurabh Sharma. The post centered around making the point that increasingly, people were recording mass events from their POV along with the media highlighting a 2 way (or 3 way rather) communication paradigm.
Case in point, the recently concluded Beijing Olympics where there was a 'ubiquity of cameras, video recording devices, and mobile phones as the teams starting marching in.' With the prevelance of communication devices this is bound to happen since every individual wants to view an event as a 'piece of me' scenario along with the mass media scenario.
(Further fuelling this self recording spree is the fact that there are a multiplicity of social media vehicles to showcase these seemingly 'personal' moments and gain another step on the social ladder - but thats another post altogether - must add here; saw an interesting Album Title the other day - "What happens in New York.. goes on Facebook!")
Saurabh seems to be making the point that Every performance now seems to be turning into a two way show, that which is being watched and that which is being watched by those who are being watched. I think its safe to add here that its actually also being watched by the peers of those who are being watched themselves. He also noticed that people are choosing to record as much as they choose to experience the moment. He asks the question - is this a new behavior or is this something we always wanted to do but never had the tools?
I dont know if i can answer the question on a general level but on a personal level, i think recording less is a habit that has been 'learned' by me by becoming familiar with recording technology. I went to Kashmir and recorded 4 - 90 minute tapes and i will never see them again. I lost out on defining moments. Humans enjoy films and that tells me that we typically don't like to see more repetition of the same thing. We like to see less of more if you know what i mean. With new recording technologies maybe we try and capture as much as we can till we realize that we probably can't cherish it. More like the classic case of over - eating na? Or the kid who put his hand in a jar full of sweets and could never get it out.
What do you think?
The thought of multiple cameras also brings to mind a possible business model. Live streaming of events through multiple eyes using crawlers (and also bandwidth) that are probably twice as efficient as we know them today? Or to start off - just a timeline led amalgamation of multimedia content with the same tags to experience an event once its over. To the same, Saurabh adds - you could also provide a service that helps people learn the art of shooting and the joy of experiencing. Something like the recording basics, say "do not just look at the world through the lens". Or experience first, carry home later.
Do add your take on the possiblility of business models that can arise as a result of this multiple documentation.
The PC Application EcoSystem. Open - Source & the futuristic web user
Posted by
Rahul Sethi
on 7:51 PM
In this post, reknowned marketeer Saurabh Sharma talks about the PC environement not having an app eco system - like the iPhone app store where applications are crafted in a way that they reflect function freed from form.
This according to him, has not happened yet because PC applications, have been dominated mainly by one software company viz. Microsoft. In the computing arena we are still carrying Microsoft influenced enterprise legacy on our shoulders.
I tended to disagree.
My response:
I think the function independent of form for PC's that you are talking about already exists. Look at the change in scenario coming about. We use so many web based apps. In my company atleast. We use Google Apps to host email (not outlook), we try using Google Docs or Zoho Docs as often as possible (not MS Office), for invoicing we use a web based invoicing tool, for Project Management we use a brilliant tool called Deskaway - it helps us simplify teamwork, it helps us manage projects, create milestones, tasks, responsibilities etc. - and it also acts like an online repository for client info (you should check it out). Then there is also slideshare on which we host our slideshows. I dont use Dreamweaver to customize my code - i do right off Wordpress. I use Wordpress/Blogger to help me convert text to code. I also use Comiqs.com to make comics and if the online version of photoshop becomes better along with my bandwidth - then il chuck the CS3 version from my laptop as well!
Point is - web based tools are making this revolution happen where multiple applications are being developed to satisfy multiple needs - almost to an extent of mass customization to the finest detail. It's fantastic.
Case in point - check out FireFox and the various Plugins - the directory and the use of some plugins is brilliant. FF has created a developer community that Apple can only dream of.
Saurabh responded by saying:
Web based application are the precursor to the freeing of function from the form in the Personal Computing Arena. I would be happy to see more of these being as mainstream enterprise solutions and everyday home applications. Part of the fact that they still do not dominate the market is perhaps to do with the fact that they are relatively new in the market and another part of it is to do with enterprise inertia to shift – the risk is bigger for a large enterprise than for a start up or home business.
Also, I am curious how the market would be in the next 10 years. Would it be still dominated by one big application software company with many 'others' competing for the rest of 10-20% of the market or could it be that the stage shifts to web based applications.
I am also curious how platforms like Firefox make money. If money is not the motive than can it becomes a mainstream business model in the future? This is something that puts me in two minds about opensource. Is it commerce or plain activism to block dominance of big players, many times suppoered on the sly by another big brother who wants to counter the current number one?
My reply:
I think your concerns with OpenSource are valid. But i think plain activism led open source is not necessarily a reality that can be supported for too long. The world is too small and the buzzworthiness of information is much higher. It takes some time before Open Source becomes consumer friendly and the people who jump on to it initially tend to be more opinionated, more experimental and i would also say a lot smarter at a certain level. They would get the news if the open source project is activism led - and if the community decides that it's fine - so be it. You cannot dictate/ change the market, can you? And i think plain activism will not work at all - the open source project has to have some tangible benefit. Only then will people look to use/ contribute. It's sort of a chain reaction, isn't it?
Pseudo open source movements today are being championed by companies such as Google, Apple, (now) Rediff and Facebook - which i think is good for their businesses and in the long run also better for consumer because one is ensured that a market is created and if consumers find something valuable, returns are reaped (although there may be imperfections and these techonomies are not as 'free' as they should be).
Also, i think developers will flock to locations and develop open source to a large extent only if they are able to answer the question 'What's in it for me' - so for example, a lot of web development companies i know have developed an app on Facebook that they seek to make viral or they have a Firefox plugin that is really useful - then these open source economies become great to showcase skills with respect to platform and customer understanding for companies (just like our respective content and idea creation companies may keep a blog etc.) and consumers also benefit. Multiple small businesses are building on each other to create an eco - system that is mutually beneficial which i think is great. My economic understanding is still not sound enough to highlight glaring pitfalls - maybe you could enlighten me on that.
This i think is also a fundamental shift in the way we think. This may sound like faff but i genuinely believe that because of the internet and the openness of the weboconomy we have become a lot more utilitarian. In terms of the monetization bit - i think it is going to become difficult for more people to monetize more things because there (has always been) but there will be more stress on the intangible value of things.
I dont know how the market would be in the next 10 years but i certainly would like to see user groups using different kind of tailor made applications by different companies. But i suspect that will not be the case, we humans are a lazy, unadventurous lot. Most of us will use many applications by the same company and a few applications here and there by smaller peripheral companies. If one of the peripheral companies becomes very popular then maybe we will use more applications by that company. We are, i think (and i hope) on the long road to multiplicity of application use. I sincerely hope, that as mankind we can shatter the idea of '3-4 big players rule a market' - especially on the web. Hopefully, better distribution channels and more emphasis on Word of Mouth online because of obvious changes in the communication eco system, economies of scope will be higher.
I cant wait for tomorrow - and i love today.
Saurabh finally summed it up by saying:
On one hand we have this huge centrifugal force of open source that is brewing diversity, enabling newer niches, getting more and more 'micro' - a dream come true for many a advanced user. And on the other hand there is the impending challenge of a basic standard or operation. A basic common ground that can integrate everything seamlessly (without making us compromise too much!). By everything I mean Internet and Mobile Applications on one side and the new genre of RFID enabled devices and static objects that would need a common grammar to relate to, so as to be able to help everything in the room (and outside) to talk to everything else.
When your shoes will talk to my friends wristwatch - we would need both of them to agree on a basic grammar for their language of communication and operation.
As computing becomes ubiquitous we would need much more interoperability and greater the interoperability the deeper perhaps would be the need for a standard. I know that this word Standard sounds too Microsoftish, but I am sure that the future would not hinge on one enterprise to dictate the 'spelling' of the new universal communication Standard.
Lot of action awaits and I am quite excited!
Social media conversational marketeers can learn a lot from the radio. It really has evolved as a medium over the last few years in india and they've become awesome at figuring out conversations that capture the pulse of the average 'metro' Indian. So they combine news with a 'gossipy' angle and then run a brand contest around it by sparking multiple sms ins and call ins. In 6 months i see social media conversational marketing at this stage as well. More brands will hopefully be willing to experiment with this radio of letters and it can become a marketing medium that mushrooms over time. Couple that with the power of sms community platforms such as sms gupshup and mytoday and it can really become a creative as well as more sticky medium.
The really awesome radio campaign that i remember was carried out by radio one previously called go 92.5 fm. They had jaggu go on a diet and he had to hit a certain mark by staying healthy so everyday there were tips, discussions et al - a lot of 'food' for content. The whole campaign was sponsored by Saffola (they got mentions within conversations as well) and it really cemented saffola's status as the healthy oil for healthy people. No idea how much they paid though - anyone?
This is something that social media technologies can enable brands to experiment with online. The audience is large enough. Roadies has done something interesting. There can be multiple variations to it i think.
major difference between radio and social media is that on radio even though you hear audience voices, they are selective. On social media, everyone has a voice so you have to be conversationally tactful - always. Radio is local. Social media is national and often international (though i dont see as much inter geographical community mixing as one would like)
The really awesome radio campaign that i remember was carried out by radio one previously called go 92.5 fm. They had jaggu go on a diet and he had to hit a certain mark by staying healthy so everyday there were tips, discussions et al - a lot of 'food' for content. The whole campaign was sponsored by Saffola (they got mentions within conversations as well) and it really cemented saffola's status as the healthy oil for healthy people. No idea how much they paid though - anyone?
This is something that social media technologies can enable brands to experiment with online. The audience is large enough. Roadies has done something interesting. There can be multiple variations to it i think.
major difference between radio and social media is that on radio even though you hear audience voices, they are selective. On social media, everyone has a voice so you have to be conversationally tactful - always. Radio is local. Social media is national and often international (though i dont see as much inter geographical community mixing as one would like)
Clicked this for my photography project. Its my wallpaper on the phone
I actually wont be able to upload the pictures today... they're still not boastworthy. Will upload tomorrow for sure.
Today ive been exploring this blogging via the mobile phone thing and i find it difficult to create hyperlinks and add pictures easily among other things. So far thats a downfall.
But its extremely handy. The mobile as a power packet is a definite possibility!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
